Legal Opinion

Claim of Pasquel v. Coverly

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 28, 1958PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Voorhis, J.

The sole issue on this appeal is whether decedent’s death resulted from accidental injuries sustained while engaged in the regular course of his employment and arising out of such employment. Appellants contend that the determination of the board is without support in fact or law and that decedent did not sustain an accident which arose out of and in the course of his employment.

The facts are not in dispute. Decedent resided in the town of Elmsford, a short distance from White Plains, New York, and was employed as a bookkeeper by appellant Coverly, an agent for Mutual of Omaha, at its office…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Matter of Heitz v. . RuppertNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. Claim of Blackley v. City of Niagara FallsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Claim of Richardson v. Fiedler Roofing, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Jaiguay v. VasquezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  3. Crees v. Sheldahl Telephone CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1965
  4. Claim of Hawthorne v. Peartrees, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  5. Boyd v. Francis Ford, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1973

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API