Cody v. Dempsey
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the plaintiff, ¡Nicholas V. Cody, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the defendknt, Mary E.. Dempsey, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Queens on the 13th day of December, 1902, upon the dismissal of the complaint hy direction of the court after a trial at the Queens County Trial Term. !
1Opinion of the Court
Woodward, J. :
This action is brought to. recover $2,500-¡as commissions alleged to be due for services rendered by Thomas F. Cody, plaintiff’s assignor, in effecting an exchange of property in the boroughs, of Manhattan and Brooklyn. There is no dispute that Thomas ’ F. Cody was employed- by William Dempsey, attorney in fact for *337Mary E. Dempsey, the owner of a tenement house in the borough ■of Manhattan, to effect a sale or exchange of this property, and it is not disputed "that Thomas F. Cody did bring together the parties who subsequently entered into an agreement, which was ■carried out,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Cotting v. Kansas City Stock Yards Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Roberson v. . Rochester Folding Box Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1902
- People v. . GillsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- People v. . HavnorNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Gay v. . SeiboldNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Frank L. Fisher Co. v. WoodsNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
- Sirkin v. Fourteenth Street StoreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
- Morgan Munitions Supply Co. v. Studebaker Corporation of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Bendell v. De DominicisNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Sarner v. Union Tp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.