Legal Opinion

Carr v. Entercom Boston, LLC

Massachusetts Superior Court

Decided October 16, 2007No. 072935BLS1Published

1Opinion of the Court

van Gestel, Allan, J.

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Howard L. Carr’s Emergency Motion for Reconsideration, Paper #21. What is challenged is part of the Memorandum and Order on Cross Motions for Judgment on the Pleadings and for Summary Judgment, Paper #19 (“Mem.”), issued on September 19, 2007 [23 Mass. L. Rptr. 138). The motion is opposed.

Although “there is no duty to reconsider a case, an issue, or a question of fact or law, once decided,” the court retains the authority to do so. King v. Globe Newspaper Co., 400 Mass. 705, 707 (1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 940 and 485 U.S.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Peterson v. HopsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  2. Dedham Water Co., Inc. v. Cumberland Farms Dairy, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
  3. United States v. Hector Rivera-Martinez, A/K/A El MenCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
  4. King v. Globe Newspaper Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
  5. King v. DriscollMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API