Michelle Richards v. Ernst & Young, LLP
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Defendant Ernst & Young, LLP appeals the district court’s denial of its motion to compel arbitration of state wage and hour claims asserted by its former employee, Michelle Richards. 1 The defendant filed the motion after the Supreme Court’s decision in AT & T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, — U.S. -, 131 S.Ct. 1740, 179 L.Ed.2d 742 (2011). The district court determined that Ernst & Young had waived its right to arbitration by failing to assert that right as a defense in an action brought by two other former employees, David Ho and Sarah Fernandez, whose action had been consolidated with…
3Cases cited12 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- American Express Co. v. Italian Colors RestaurantSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Compucredit Corp. v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Peterson v. Highland Music, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Fisher v. A.G. Becker Paribas Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by9 opinions
- D.R. Horton, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013
- Bekele v. Lyft, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2016
- Sakyi v. Estée Lauder Cos.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Totten v. Kellogg Brown & Root, LLCDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2016
- Herrington v. Waterstone Mortgage Corp.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2014
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.