Legal Opinion

Michelle Richards v. Ernst & Young, LLP

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 21, 2013No. 11-17530PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Defendant Ernst & Young, LLP appeals the district court’s denial of its motion to compel arbitration of state wage and hour claims asserted by its former employee, Michelle Richards. 1 The defendant filed the motion after the Supreme Court’s decision in AT & T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, — U.S. -, 131 S.Ct. 1740, 179 L.Ed.2d 742 (2011). The district court determined that Ernst & Young had waived its right to arbitration by failing to assert that right as a defense in an action brought by two other former employees, David Ho and Sarah Fernandez, whose action had been consolidated with…

3Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. American Express Co. v. Italian Colors RestaurantSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  3. Compucredit Corp. v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  4. Peterson v. Highland Music, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  5. Fisher v. A.G. Becker Paribas Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by9 opinions

  1. D.R. Horton, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013
  2. Bekele v. Lyft, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2016
  3. Sakyi v. Estée Lauder Cos.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  4. Totten v. Kellogg Brown & Root, LLCDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2016
  5. Herrington v. Waterstone Mortgage Corp.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2014

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API