Legal Opinion

Herrington v. Waterstone Mortgage Corp.

District Court, W.D. Wisconsin

Decided January 28, 2014No. 11-cv-779-bbcPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

BARBARA B. CRABB, District Judge.

In 2011, plaintiff Pamela Herrington filed this proposed class action under the Fair Labor Standards Act and state law, alleging that defendant Waterstone Mortgage Corporation failed to pay its loan officers for overtime work. In an order dated March 16, 2012, dkt. # 57, 2012 WL 1242318, I concluded that plaintiffs claims would have to be resolved through arbitration under an agreement between the parties. However, in accordance with In re D.R. Horton, Inc., 357 NLRB No. 184 (2012), available at 2012 WL 36274, I also concluded that the…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Howsam v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Totten v. Kellogg Brown & Root, LLCDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2016
  2. Pollard v. ETS PC, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2016
  3. Bell v. Ryan Transportation Service, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API