Legal Opinion
Ross v. Ford Motor Credit Co.
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided October 12, 1993No. Nos. WD 46531, WD 46567PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KENNEDY, Presiding Judge.
Plaintiffs, Tony and Juanita Ross, had verdicts and judgments against Ford Motor Credit Company (Ford Motor Credit) for actual and punitive damages on several counts growing out of Ford Motor Credit’s repossession in a replevin action of a 1979 Mercury automobile in the possession of the Rosses. Ford Motor Credit has appealed.
The Rosses have cross-appealed from the judgments in their libel and conversion claims against Ford Motor Credit, with the *549complaint that the trial court erred by reducing the amounts of their actual damages awarded by the jury verdicts, and from…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp. of Bay ViewSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Fabricor, Inc. v. E.I. DuPont De Nemours & Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2000
- Jenkins v. Revolution Helicopter Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1996
- France v. HunterMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
- State v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1999
- State of Missouri vs. David Shawn WilliamsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2025