Legal Opinion

Hawksby v. DePietro

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided July 25, 2000Published

1Opinion of the Court

754 A.2d 1168 (2000)

165 N.J. 58

Donald HAWKSBY and Joanna Hawksby, his wife, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

Joseph A. DePIETRO, M.D., Defendant-Respondent, and

Walter Urs, M.D., Matthew Garfinkel, M.D., William H. Ross, D.O., Metuchen Orthopaedic Group, John Doe, M.D. 1-50, Jane Doe, M.D. 1-50, John Doe, R.N. 1-50, Jane Doe, R.N. 1-50, John Doe 1-50, Jane Doe 1-50 and John Doe Corp. 1-50, (Fictitious Names), Defendants.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued November 29, 1999.

Decided July 25, 2000.

E. Drew Britcher, Morristown, for plaintiffs-appellants (Leonard & Butler, attorneys).

Francis E. Borowsky,…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Millison v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
  2. Evers v. DollingerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  3. Scafidi v. SeilerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
  4. Karins v. City of Atlantic CitySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
  5. Fischer v. CanarioSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API