Legal Opinion

Fischer v. Canario

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided January 30, 1996PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

GARIBALDI, J.

The primary issue in this appeal is the scope of the prospective application of the damage-apportionment rule announced by the Court in Scafidi v. Seiler, 119 N.J. 93, 574 A.2d 398 (1990). Also at issue is whether the trial court erred in refusing to give the jury an “ultimate outcome” charge.

I

On October 11, 1984, Rachel Fischer, then sixty-one years old, went to the emergency room of Newark Beth Israel Medical Center (Beth Israel) as a result of a fall. Dr. Arthur T. Canario, an orthopedic surgeon, examined an x-ray of her shoulder,…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Chicot County Drainage District v. Baxter State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Hopkins v. Fox & Lazo RealtorsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
  4. Busik v. LevineSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
  5. Ramirez v. Amsted Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1981

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. Wade v. Kessler InstituteSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2002
  2. Mogull v. CB Commercial Real Estate Group, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2000
  3. Brodsky v. Grinnell Haulers, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2004
  4. State v. PurnellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
  5. Township of Stafford v. Stafford Township Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1998

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API