Fischer v. Canario
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
GARIBALDI, J.
The primary issue in this appeal is the scope of the prospective application of the damage-apportionment rule announced by the Court in Scafidi v. Seiler, 119 N.J. 93, 574 A.2d 398 (1990). Also at issue is whether the trial court erred in refusing to give the jury an “ultimate outcome” charge.
I
On October 11, 1984, Rachel Fischer, then sixty-one years old, went to the emergency room of Newark Beth Israel Medical Center (Beth Israel) as a result of a fall. Dr. Arthur T. Canario, an orthopedic surgeon, examined an x-ray of her shoulder,…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Chicot County Drainage District v. Baxter State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Hopkins v. Fox & Lazo RealtorsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
- Busik v. LevineSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
- Ramirez v. Amsted Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Wade v. Kessler InstituteSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2002
- Mogull v. CB Commercial Real Estate Group, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2000
- Brodsky v. Grinnell Haulers, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2004
- State v. PurnellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
- Township of Stafford v. Stafford Township Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.