Legal Opinion

Corti v. Cooney

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 1926PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, J.

It is contended here that as a matter of law the defendants were not guilty of negligence and that the plaintiffs were guilty of contributory negligence. Wé have examined the evidence and are of the opinion that a jury question is presented by the evidence upon both phases of the case. Inasmuch as there must be a new trial, we purposely refrain from further comment upon the evidence. Were it not for the matters now to be adverted to, the judgments should be affirmed.

The principal error assigned in the case arises out of the misconduct of the plaintiffs’ attorney upon the trial. Prior to the…

2Cited by17 opinions

  1. Haid v. LoderstedtNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
  2. United States v. ValenciaUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1952
  3. Georgeson v. NielsenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
  4. United States v. LeviCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1949
  5. Dutcher v. Phoenix InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API