Legal Opinion

Leisner v. Kent Investors, Inc.

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 23, 1970PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSaul S. Streit, J.

Motions numbered 9 and 10 of January 8, 1970, are consolidated herewith and disposed of as follows: petitioner Morris Leisner seeks an order in the nature of a writ of mandamus requiring Pell City Estates, Inc., and Kent Investors, Inc., to peremptorily submit all their books, records, papers and contracts, including minute books and stock transfer books, to the inspection of petitioner and his counsel and for an audit of such books, accounts and papers. The written demands for such inspection dated November 10,1969 were served November 19, 1969, on the respective corporations. Section 624 of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. MATTER OF COHEN v. Cocoline Prods.New York Court of Appeals · 1955
  2. Brentmore Estates, Inc. v. Hotel Barbizon, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
  3. In re DiamondNew York Supreme Court · 1955

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Schwartzman v. Schwartzman Packing Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1983
  2. United States v. MPM Contractors, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1991
  3. Beltrone v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API