Legal Opinion
Marriage of Adams v. Adams
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided September 23, 1986No. CO-86-688Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RANDALL, Judge.
Mary Sue Anderson Adams appeals from the trial court’s denial of her motion to vacate a dissolution judgment and decree. We affirm.
FACTS
Respondent Walter Strong Adams III commenced the dissolution action on November 19, 1984. The parties entered a stipulation into the record in open court on the day set for trial, March 11,1985. Both parties were questioned as to their understanding of the stipulated agreement and as to whether or not they agreed to it. The stipulation was reduced to writing, and on March 21, 1985, the court entered its judgment and decree incorporating…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Theodore R. Kupferman, as Receiver of Vickers, Christy & Co., Inc. v. Consolidated Research and Manufacturing Corporation, Daniel JacobsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- Kerwit Medical Products, Inc. v. N. & H. Instruments, Inc. (Humanetics, Inc.)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Ronnkvist v. RonnkvistSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Tomscak v. TomscakCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Cahaley v. CahaleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.