Legal Opinion

Royal Auto Parts v. State

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided July 20, 1982No. Docket 56889PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendants appeal as of right an order of the trial court declaring that MCL 257.12a; MSA 9.1812(1), “which defines the term 'distressed vehicle’, insofar as it relates to and is used in §§ 217(c)(1), (2), and (3) [MCL 257.217c(l), (2), and (3); MSA 9.1917(3X1), (2), and (3)], of said act [Michigan Vehicle Code, MCL 257.1 et seq.; MSA 9.1801 et seq.], is unconstitutional, because said definition does not establish reasonable and rational standards for the determination of a class of vehicles requiring the issuance of a salvage certificate of title.” Plaintiffs are automobile dealers who…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. CAF Investment Co. v. State Tax CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Nunn v. GA CANTRICK CO., INC.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Frost-Pack Distributing Co. v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1977

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Martinez v. Enterprise Rent-A-Car Co.California Court of Appeal · 2004
  2. Sheridan Road Baptist Church v. Department of EducationMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Klem v. Access Ins. Co., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  4. People v. BarnesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. People v. MasseyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API