Royal Auto Parts v. State
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Defendants appeal as of right an order of the trial court declaring that MCL 257.12a; MSA 9.1812(1), “which defines the term 'distressed vehicle’, insofar as it relates to and is used in §§ 217(c)(1), (2), and (3) [MCL 257.217c(l), (2), and (3); MSA 9.1917(3X1), (2), and (3)], of said act [Michigan Vehicle Code, MCL 257.1 et seq.; MSA 9.1801 et seq.], is unconstitutional, because said definition does not establish reasonable and rational standards for the determination of a class of vehicles requiring the issuance of a salvage certificate of title.” Plaintiffs are automobile dealers who…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- CAF Investment Co. v. State Tax CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
- Nunn v. GA CANTRICK CO., INC.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1982
- Frost-Pack Distributing Co. v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
3Cited by10 opinions
- Martinez v. Enterprise Rent-A-Car Co.California Court of Appeal · 2004
- Sheridan Road Baptist Church v. Department of EducationMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
- Klem v. Access Ins. Co., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- People v. BarnesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
- People v. MasseyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.