Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

United States v. Regan

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided June 11, 1981No. SPCM 15221Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partLewis, Judge

Two of the appellant’s assignments of error focus upon a specification laid under Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice. As amended, it alleged in pertinent part that “[the appellant] ... threw butter on the ceiling in The Dining Facility of the 307th Engineer Battalion. This being conduct which is prejudicial to the good order and discipline of the Armed Forces and service discrediting.” Prior to its amendment on the motion of the prosecution, the specification included language that alleged disorderly conduct by throwing butter.

I disagree with the majority’s opinion that the final…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. CareUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
  2. United States v. MarkerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1952
  3. United States v. GorhamUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API