Roe v. Widme
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
I. M. OLSEN, Justice.
Plaintiff appeals from an order of the district court opening a default judgment in his favor and permitting defendant to appear and demur to the complaint and to defend in the suit.
The complaint is upon a promissory note for $49, given by defendant December 17, 1923, and due November 1, 1924. The complaint alleges that no payments thereon have been made. This action was commenced by service of the summons on March 14, 1933. Defendant failed to answer, and judgment on default was entered against her on June 24, 1933. Execution was issued on the same day and returned…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Brasie v. Minneapolis Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. Benson Produce Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
- McDonald v. TetraultSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kittson County v. Wells, Denbrook & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Roehrdanz v. BrillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- State v. TupaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
- Northland Temporaries, Inc. v. TurpinCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008
- Grunke v. KloskinCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984