Matter of Moynihan v. New York City Health & Hosps. Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1DissentMoskowitz, J.
For the reasons that the majority states, I agree that we should dismiss petitioner’s Labor Law § 740 claim on the basis that it is time-barred. I also agree that we should dismiss petitioner’s *1035claims for tortious interference with prospective business relations, violation of Administrative Code of the City of New York § 12-113 and violation of the constitutional right of free speech. However, in my view, the motion court properly granted petitioner’s motion for leave to file a late notice of claim. Similarly, I believe that at this stage of the litigation, petitioner has adequately pleaded a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Williams v. Nassau County Medical CenterNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
- Webb-Weber v. Community Action for Human Services, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2014
- Khatibi v. WeillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Matarrese v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Reddington v. Staten Island University HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 2008
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.