Legal Opinion

Schneider v. Minnesota Mutual Life Insurance

Montana Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 1991No. 89-574PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hunt

Following a bench trial, the District Court of the Sixteenth Judicial District, Carter County, found defendant and appellant, Minnesota Mutual Life Insurance Company, liable on a life insurance policy sold to plaintiff and respondent, Darlene Schneider, and her husband, Jock Schneider. Minnesota Mutual appeals. We affirm.

The following issues are raised on appeal:

1. Did the District Court err in failing to enter judgment in favor of Minnesota Mutual?

2. Did the District Court err in allowing expert testimony?

On March 7, 1983, Jock Schneider renewed his existing loans at the First National Bank…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Prudential Insurance Company of America v. AnayaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Little v. Grizzly ManufacturingMontana Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Tope v. TaylorMontana Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Berger v. Minnesota Mutual Life Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1986
  5. John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. ConwayCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1951

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Williams v. Union Fidelity Life InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Schlemmer v. North Central Life InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Ioerger v. ReinerMontana Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. ThompsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1995
  5. In Re the Marriage of WerslandMontana Supreme Court · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API