Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Van Bokkelen

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided April 17, 1931PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Foley, S.

Charles Auguste Kennerly-Hall and Kenneth Stirling, non-resident creditors of the decedent, on whose behalf this proceeding has been brought, seek to vacate a decree settling the account of Walter Van Bokkelen, as temporary administrator, on the ground that they were not made parties to the accounting proceeding in Which the decree was made. They ask, in the alternative, that he be compelled tó file a new account of his proceedings, in which citation should issue to all unpaid creditors of the decedent.

The claim of the petitioners is predicated upon a note for $125,000 executed by…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In re RecknagelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
  2. In Re the Estate of MeyerNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
  3. In re the Estate of WorchNew York Surrogate's Court · 1925
  4. In re the Estate of MeyerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1925
  5. In re the Estate of PurcellNew York Surrogate's Court · 1930

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of Van BokkelenNew York Surrogate's Court · 1938
  2. In re the Estate of ReillyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API