Legal Opinion

In Re the Estate of Meyer

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 1, 1927PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

An ancillary executor being named in this State, what might be the rights of a non-resident creditor of the estate, should the surrogate elect to adjudicate as to the claims of residents we do not attempt to consider. That the surrogate may entertain and direct the payment of his claim we are clear (Surrogate’s Court Act, sec. 165). Equally clear is it that the surrogate may refuse to pass upon all claims, whether of residents . or non-residents. The local assets must then be remitted to the foreign executor to be administered and distributed by him. That the surrogate has done here. No…

2Cited by13 opinions

  1. Wedemann v. United States Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1932
  2. In re the Estate of LambornNew York Surrogate's Court · 1938
  3. Wilson v. BeardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
  4. In re the Estate of CohenNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933
  5. In re the Estate of CornellNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API