Legal Opinion

State v. Molnar

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 13, 2004No. 64A03-0305-CR-202PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BARNES, Judge.

Case Summary

The State brings this interlocutory appeal to challenge the trial court's granting of Joseph Molnar's motion to suppress results from a breath test. We reverse.

Issue

The sole issue for our review is whether the trial court erroneously granted the motion to suppress.

Facts

The relevant facts are that on February 24, 2003, the State charged Molnar with operating a vehicle while intoxicated, a Class A misdemeanor, along with two other traffic offenses. In April 2003, Molnar filed a motion to suppress evidence, which he later withdrew, and filed an amended motion to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Poehlman v. FefermanIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Wright v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. State v. LloydIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. People v. MillerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  5. Indiana Department of Environmental Management v. Schnippel Construction, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Napier v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. Short v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. Guy v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. Bernard Short v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. Guy v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API