Legal Opinion

Napier v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided January 6, 2005No. 55A01-0406-CR-237PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BAKER, Judge.

This is a case of first impression, where we are called upon to decide the applicability of the rule set forth in Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36, 124 S.Ct. 1354, 158 L.Ed.2d 177 (2004), as it relates to the State's method of establishing a proper evidentiary foundation regarding the admissibility of various documents that are used to prove the results of a criminal defendant's breath test. Appellant-defendant Joseph E. Napier appeals his convietion for Operating a Vehicle With a BAC of .08 Percent Or More, 1 a class C misdemeanor, claiming that his conviction may not…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Platt v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Hammon v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. Mullins v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1995

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State v. ChunSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2008
  2. United States v. RankinNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2006
  3. Bohsancurt v. EisenbergCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
  4. Commonwealth v. ZeiningerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2011
  5. State v. NormanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API