Legal Opinion

United States v. Mir Islam

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided August 2, 2019No. 18-3003PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Katsas, Circuit Judge:

This appeal addresses the legal consequences of a criminal defendant's failure to object to a magistrate judge's adverse report and recommendation. We also consider claims that defense counsel provided ineffective assistance during proceedings to revoke a term of supervised release.

I

Mir Islam received two federal sentences for various offenses. In the Southern District of New York, Islam pleaded guilty to crimes involving credit-card fraud, identity theft, and computer hacking. An SDNY judge sentenced him to one day of imprisonment followed by three years of supervised…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Puckett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. Moody v. DaggettSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. BlakeNebraska Supreme Court · 2022
  2. United States v. Daraya MarshallCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2020
  3. United States v. Keniel ThomasCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2021
  4. United States v. Azam DoostCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2021
  5. United States v. Torres-SantanaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2021

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API