Anderson v. Supervisors of San Francisco
Supreme Court of Minnesota
The petition of plaintiff and others to the defendant board of supervisors to establish a highway being refused, plaintiff appealed to the district court for Carver county. The matter was tried before Cadwell, J., and a jury, which rendered a verdict reversing the action of defendant board and declaring the proposed highway of public benefit. From an order denying a motion for a new trial, defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
The supervisors of the town of San Francisco, in Carver county, were duly petitioned by the requisite number of persons to lay out and establish a highway in said town. The petition was prepared and properly posted as required by statute on August 26, 1902,- and the original filed with the town clerk of that town on the 30th of that month. On October 9, following, the board of supervisors caused notice to be given of hearing on the petition, which was duly posted as required by law. At the time of hearing thereon the supervisors made an order refusing the prayer of the petition, and declining…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hurst v. Town of MartinsburgSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
- Burkleo v. County of WashingtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
3Cited by9 opinions
- Viebahn v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
- Baldwin v. Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
- Freeman v. Township of Pine CitySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- State v. Tower Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
- Goerndt v. Town of Scandia ValleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.