Burkleo v. County of Washington
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Washington county, McCluer, J., presiding, refusing a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.
Action to enjoin defendants from opening a highway across plaintiff’s land. The contention of the plaintiff is that the proceedings of the county commissioners in attempting to lay out the highway in question were void, because they never acquired jurisdiction. The only question in the case going to the jurisdiction of the board arises out of the following state of facts: The board met in regular session on the fourth Monday in July, the date fixed by statute. Gen. St. 1878, c. 13, § 102. They continued in session three days, and adjourned until September 14th, at which last date the petition…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Hurst v. Town of MartinsburgSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
- Butterfield v. TreichlerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901
- Thompson v. Town of BerlinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
- Anderson v. Supervisors of San FranciscoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
- Minneapolis Brewing Co. v. City of East Grand ForksSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.