Legal Opinion

Riley v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 29, 1997No. 70248PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOWD, Presiding Judge.

Omar Riley (Movant) filed a pro se, Rule 24.035 motion seeking to vacate three, concurrent twelve-year sentences for sale of crack cocaine, § 195.211, RSMo 1994,1 and two counts of second-degree assault, § 565.060, because he was allegedly incompetent to enter a plea. Subsequently, the motion court assigned Movant an attorney, (Counsel) who filed a statement indicating that he had reviewed the case and determined that there was no need to amend the pro se motion. This statement was filed after the Rule 24.035 deadline for filing an amended motion and did not specify that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Luleff v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  2. Phillips v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. Backues v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Chesnut v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Bruce v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Brown v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. Allmon v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Richard Wesley Williams v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API