Legal Opinion

Bruce v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 25, 1990No. 57332PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

CRIST, Judge.

Movant appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion after an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

Movant was charged by information of two counts of robbery in the first degree, one count of armed criminal action, and one count of assault in the first degree. Mov-ant was jointly charged with a codefendant. Movant entered a guilty plea to all four counts. He was sentenced to a total of fifteen years’ imprisonment.

Movant filed a pro se motion under Rule 24.035 alleging his counsel was ineffective in that she induced him to plead guilty. No amended motion was filed. At the eviden-tiary…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. PerezMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Woolsey v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Riley v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API