Trinity Area School District v. Dickson
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Hoppman, J.,
Appellants, C. Garey Dickson and Baker and Coombs, Inc., contend that the trial court erred in refusing to join seven additional defendants. Moreover, Baker and Coombs, the only additional defendant joined by the court, alleges that the lower court erred in joining Baker and Coombs as an additional defendant.
Appellant Dickson contracted with the Trinity Area School District (hereinafter Trinity) on March 9, 1960 and agreed to provide Trinity with the architectural services needed in the construction of additions and alterations to an existing Junior-Senior High School.…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Kilian v. Allegheny County DistributorsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- Balla v. SladekSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- Schladensky v. EllisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Kitchen v. Grampian BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Brandywine Area Joint School Authority v. VanCor, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- John T. Witherow v. The Firestone Tire & Rubber Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Rivera v. Philadelphia Theological Seminary of St. Charles Borromeo, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Gibson v. MillerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Hughes v. PronSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Commonwealth v. One 1985 Dark Blue Mercedes Benz CarSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.