Legal Opinion
Nippon Steel Corp. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided June 15, 2005No. Consol. 01-00103PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion and ORDER
EATON, Judge.
[United States International Trade Commission’s remand determination of a sunset review of countervailing and antidump-ing duty orders on grain-oriented silicon electrical steel affirmed in part, remanded in part]
This matter is before the court following remand to the United States International Trade Commission (“ITC” or “Commission”). In Nippon Steel Corp. v. United States, 301 F.Supp.2d 1355 (2003) (“Nippon IV”), the court remanded, for a second time, the ITC’s sunset review 1 determination that material injury to an industry in the United States would be…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. The United States and Zenith Radio CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Atlantic Sugar, Ltd. v. The United States and Amstar CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Huaiyin Foreign Trade Corp. (30) v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Nippon Steel Corp. v. United States International Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- Diamond Sawblades Manufacturers Coalition v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Nucor Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2008
- Committee for Fair Beam Imports v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007
- Nippon Steel Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.