Legal Opinion

Nippon Steel Corp. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided May 9, 2006No. Consol. 01-00103PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EATON, Judge.

This consolidated action 1 is before the court following remand to the United States International Trade Commission (“ITC” or the “Commission”) of its affirmative injury determination contained in Grain-Oriented Silicon Electrical Steel From Italy and Japan, Invs. Nos. 701-TA-355 and 731-TA-659-660 (Review) (Second Remand), USITC Pub. 3680 (Mar.2004) (“Second Remand Determination”). See Nippon Steel Corp. v. United States, 29 CIT -, 391 F.Supp.2d 1258 (2005) (“Nippon V”). Pursuant to remand, the ITC issued its third remand determination in Grain-Oriented Silicon Electrical…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Messenger v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  4. South Corporation and Seal Fleet, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1982
  5. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. The United States and Zenith Radio CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Nippon Steel Corp. v. United States International Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
  2. Celanese Chemicals Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2008
  3. Nippon Steel Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007
  4. Nippon Steel Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API