Halfmoon v. Moore
Idaho Supreme Court
1ConcurrenceAnderson, Justice, joined by Kee-Ton, Justice
(dissenting).
In my opinion, the facts in the authorities cited and relied upon by the majority opinion are so different from the facts of the case now before us as to clearly distinguish such authorities and make their holdings inapplicable here. In addition to the facts set out in the majority opinion, there was a specific devise of certain real property to testatrix’ daughter, Mary Halfmoon (Moore) in addition to naming her as the residuary devisee and legatee.
As the majority opinion states, the cases dealing with pretermitted heirs are numerous; but, surprisingly, they are nearly all cases…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- In Re Estate of TrickettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- In re Estate of CallaghanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- In re the Estate of ParrottNevada Supreme Court · 1922
- Estate of CarterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Wolcott v. ShawCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1930
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.