In re Estate of Callaghan
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from orders of the Superior Court of the City and County of San ¡francisco, granting petitions of respondent and denying the petition of appellants for partial distribution of the estate of a deceased person. J. V. Coffey, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcFARLAND, J.
The estate of Ann Callaghan, under administration in the probate court, being in a condition to warrant a partial distribution, petitions for such partial distribution were filed by Daniel T. Callaghan, son of the decedent, and Mary A. Bailey, daughter of the decedent, and certain of said Mary’s children. Said Daniel and Mary were the only surviving children; and the petitions for distribution excluded any interest of Bertha Callaghan and Josephine Callaghan, who were grandchildren of the decedent and minor children of Sherwood Callaghan, who was the son of the decedent and died during her…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Payne v. PayneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
- In re Estate of GarraudCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
- McCourtney v. MathesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1871
3Cited by27 opinions
- Torregano v. TorreganoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Allison v. Allison's ExecutorsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1903
- In Re Estate of TrickettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Frayssinous v. BrugnoliCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Estate of CarterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.