Town of Ragland v. Poe
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
There are but two assignments of error on the record. The first is predicated on the refusal of the affirmative charge requested in writing by the defendant. The bill of exceptions does not purport to set out all of'the evidence, and, under the repeated rulings of this court, this assignment cannot be sustained. Garrett v. State, 215 Ala, 224, 110 So. 23; Sanders v. Steen, 128 Ala. 633, 29 So. 586; Clardy v. Walker, 132 Ala. 264, 31 So. 78; Davis v. State, 168 Ala. 53, 52 So. 939.
The other assignment is predicated on the refusal of charge A, requested by the defendant, which was bad in form…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Birmingham Belt R. Co. v. NelsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
- Cain v. SkillinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- Clardy v. WalkerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1901
- Sanders v. SteenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1900
- Alabama Lime & Stone Co. v. AdamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Stanley v. People's Sav. BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
- Stafford v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932