Legal Opinion

Kankakee Coal Co. v. Crane Bros. Manufacturing Co.

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1891PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from the Appellate Court for the Second District;— heard in that court on appeal from the Circuit Court of Kankakee county; the Hon. N. J. Pillsbury, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Magruder

This is a petition for a mechanic’s lien filed by the appellee against the appellants and is the same ease, which was before/ us once before, reported as Kankakee Coal Co. v. Manufacturing Co. 128 Ill. 627. We reversed the case, because the notes, given for the engine were not produced, nor their non-produc-, tion accounted for. After the cause was reinstated in the' •court below, and upon the second hearing, the three notes were produced by the petitioner below, the appellee here. They are signed by the Kankakee Coal Co., and are payable to the order of the Crane Bros. Manufacturing Company.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Parkhurst v. VailIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Brady v. AndersonIllinois Supreme Court · 1860
  3. Eberhart v. PageIllinois Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Kankakee Coal Co. v. Crane Bros. Manufacturing Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Martin v. BeckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. McMillan v. Joseph P. Casey Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1923
  3. George S. Lyon & Sons Lumber & Manf. Co. v. Equitable Loan & Investment Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Board v. O'DonovanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1899
  5. Cosgrove v. FarwellAppellate Court of Illinois · 1904

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API