Legal Opinion

Risedorf v. Fyfe

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 3, 1928No. Gen. No. 32,619PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Holdom

delivered the opinion of the court.

This is an action on the case for personal injuries resulting from the automobile of defendant striking and injuring the plaintiff. Originally James Fyfe and his wife, Ruth Fyfe, were defendants. At the trial defendant Ruth Fyfe was dismissed out of the case.

The defendant, James Fyfe, was served with a pluries summons returnable to the January term, 1926, of the court, and as to Ruth Fyfe, pluries. summons was returned not found. The summons was served too late for the January term, and under the statute the cause stood continued…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Plaff v. Pacific Express Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Cairo & St. Louis Railroad v. HolbrookIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
  3. American Mail Order Co. v. MarshAppellate Court of Illinois · 1905
  4. Kalkaska Manufacturing Co. v. ThomasAppellate Court of Illinois · 1885

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ellman v. De RuiterIllinois Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Till v. KaraAppellate Court of Illinois · 1959
  3. Frank v. NewburgerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1939
  4. Heinsius v. PoehlmannAppellate Court of Illinois · 1935
  5. Mercer v. MercerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API