Legal Opinion

Frank v. Newburger

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 3, 1939No. Gen. No. 40,308PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Connor

May 5,1938, Walter A. Salomon, Harold A. Salomon and Arthur M. Salomon and their wives filed their verified motion under section 72 of the Civil Practice Act, to vacate and set aside a decree of foreclosure entered November 13 ,1936, and all other orders entered in the foreclosure proceeding* subsequent to that date, and that they be given leave to defend the amended bill of foreclosure. Counsel for plaintiff was notified of the motion but filed no pleading of any kind; on May 7th the court entered an order which recited that after the court heard the argument of counsel for both sides it was…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Bronson v. SchultenSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Mitchell v. KingIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Jacobson v. AshkinazeIllinois Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Marabia v. Mary Thompson Hospital of Chicago for Women & ChildrenIllinois Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Ernst Tosetti Brewing Co. v. KoehlerIllinois Supreme Court · 1902

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Park Avenue Lumber & Supply Co. v. Nils A. Hofverberg, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1966
  2. Nikola v. Campus Towers Apartment Building Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1940
  3. Lusk v. BluhmAppellate Court of Illinois · 1944
  4. Chmielewski v. MarichAppellate Court of Illinois · 1953
  5. Schwartz v. KominskiAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API