Northern Hills Sanitation, Inc. v. Cossart
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
WOLLMAN, Justice.
The question presented by this appeal is whether a private contract carrier who hauls garbage and solid waste from a municipality to a landfill site operated by the private carrier is required to purchase and display compensation plates pursuant to the requirements of SDCL 32-9. The trial court’s judgment answered that question in the affirmative, and we affirm.
Appellant is a business corporation organized under the laws of this state for the purpose of the gathering, collecting, and disposing of solid waste, garbage, refuse, and other discarded materials. In 1975 the cities…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Fairchild v. United Service CorporationNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1948
- Visco v. State Ex Rel. PickrellArizona Supreme Court · 1963
- Masgai v. Public Service CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Lincoln County v. JohnsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
- Lien v. RoweSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1958
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Browning-Ferris, Inc. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1983
- Railroad Commission of Texas v. Waste Management of Texas, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1994
- National Serv-All, Inc. v. Indiana Department of State RevenueIndiana Tax Court · 1994
- Northern Tier Solid Waste Authority v. Commonwealth, Department of RevenueCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Railroad Commission of Texas Environmental Transportation Services, Inc. Waste Processor Industries, Inc. Channel Transportation Co., Inc. WPI Trucking, Inc. Texas Tank Truck Carriers Association, Inc. Allwaste Environmental Services v. Waste Management of Texas, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1994