Legal Opinion

G.C. Ex Rel. Counts v. North Clackamas School District

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided August 21, 2009No. CV 07-686-HUPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

MOSMAN, District Judge.

On February 5, 2009, and June 25, 2009, Magistrate Judge Hubei issued Findings and Recommendations (“F & Rs”) (## 49, 59) in the above-captioned case recommending that I GRANT defendants’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (# 24) as to the individual defendants on the Title IX claim, DENY summary judgment as to defendant District on the Title IX claim, and GRANT summary judgment as to the section 1983 claims as to all defendants. Plaintiff (# 65) and defendants (# 60) filed Objections to the F & Rs.

DISCUSSION

The magistrate judge makes only…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. DOE v. MANOR COLLEGEDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
  2. Gililland v. Southwestern Oregon Community College DistrictDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2021
  3. L.O.K v. Greater Albany Public School District 8JDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2022
  4. Robert R v. Jefferson County School District R-1District Court, D. Colorado · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API