Cahoon v. Kubatzky
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Marshall, Judge.
These three appeals arise out of the same transaction and involve the question of whether there was a divisible *394contract of employment between the parties.
This record establishes that in late October and early November, 1973, Kubatzky, an experienced construction supervisor, began personal negotiations primarily with Cahoon as a principal stockholder and officer of Princess Square Homes, Inc., (the other owner being Copeland) to supervise the proposed construction of condominiums by the corporation. During this period of time the corporation was attempting to obtain…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Cooper v. RosserSupreme Court of Georgia · 1974
- Hinson v. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
- Rogers v. ParhamSupreme Court of Georgia · 1850
- Brown v. GlassCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
- Alexander v. KendrickCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Toncee, Inc. v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
- Douglas & Lomason Co. v. HallCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
- Campbell v. CGMDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2017