Legal Opinion

Straley v. Frank

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 31, 1991No. 89-3505, 90-1546PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

585 So.2d 334 (1991)

Mark K. STRALEY, Appellant,

v.

Stacy FRANK, Appellee.

Nos. 89-3505, 90-1546.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 31, 1991.

Rehearing Denied as Moot September 19, 1991.

Raymond A. Alley, Jr., Tampa, for appellant.

Susan Latham Steffey and Stephen W. Sessums, of Sessums & Mason, P.A., Tampa, for appellee.

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

2Per curiam

Pursuant to motion of the appellant, Mark K. Straley, this case has been considered en banc in order to maintain consistency in the case law of the Second District Court of Appeal, for whom we have been appointed to sit by order…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Diamantis; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Diamantis; Dissent.

3Cases cited63 opinions

  1. Canakaris v. CanakarisSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
  2. Florida Patient's Compensation Fund v. RoweSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
  3. Standard Guar. Ins. Co. v. QuanstromSupreme Court of Florida · 1990
  4. Ball v. BallSupreme Court of Florida · 1976
  5. Cummings v. CummingsSupreme Court of Florida · 1976

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by7 opinions

  1. Robertson v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
  2. In Re FrankSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
  3. Straley v. FrankDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  4. Frank v. StraleySupreme Court of Florida · 1992
  5. Inquiry Concerning a Judge, No. 96-30, re FrankSupreme Court of Florida · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API