Legal Opinion

Ball v. Ball

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 30, 1976No. 46598PublishedCited by 150 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

335 So.2d 5 (1976)

Madge P. BALL, Petitioner,

v.

Dexter C. BALL, Respondent.

No. 46598.

Supreme Court of Florida,

June 30, 1976.

Ernest S. Marshall, Bradenton, for petitioner.

ENGLAND, Justice.

We granted certiorari in this case, pursuant to Article V, Section 3(b)(3) of the Florida Constitution, to resolve an apparent conflict between the decision of the Second District Court of Appeal, now reported at 303 So.2d 32, and Hegel v. Hegel, 248 So.2d 212 (Fla.App.3d 1971). The sole issue before us concerns the presumption of gift or special equity which can arise in a marriage dissolution when real…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Strauss v. StraussSupreme Court of Florida · 1941
  2. Steinhauer v. SteinhauerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971
  3. Shannon v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1976
  4. Calligarich v. CalligarichDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971
  5. Pyle v. PyleSupreme Court of Florida · 1951

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by150 opinions

  1. Canakaris v. CanakarisSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
  2. Duncan v. DuncanSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
  3. Landay v. LandaySupreme Court of Florida · 1983
  4. Ward v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1986
  5. Marsh v. MarshSupreme Court of Florida · 1982

145 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API