Legal Opinion

In re: EpiPen Direct Purchaser Litigation

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided April 10, 2023No. 0:20-cv-00827Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA In re: EpiPen Direct Purchaser Litigation File No. 20-cv-0827 (ECT/JFD) THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: OPINION AND ORDER ALL ACTIONS ________________________________________________________________________ Noah Silverman, Bruce E. Gerstein, Jonathan M. Gerstein, Samuel E. Bonderoff, and Joseph Opper, Garwin Gerstein & Fisher LLP, New York, NY; David F. Sorenson, Caitlin G. Coslett, and Andrew C. Curley, Berger Montague PC, Philadelphia, PA; E. Michelle Drake, Berger & Montague PC, Minneapolis, MN; David S. Golub and Steven Bloch, Silver Golub &…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Ashley County, Ark. v. Pfizer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
  4. Beck v. PrupisSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Republic of Panama v. BCCI Holdings (Luxembourg) S.A.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API