Legal Opinion
Kendrick Lee Harris v. St. Louis Police Department City of St. Louis, Officer MacK 976, Officer Finan Kelly, 8657 Area II Command Officer Rice, 2204
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided December 22, 1998No. 98-1810PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Per curiam
Kendrick Lee Harris appeals from the final judgment entered in the District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action with prejudice. For reversal, Harris argues that the district court erred in (1) denying his motion for a default judgment against defendant Derrick Mack, and (2) granting Mack’s Fed. R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss Plarris’s complaint. For the reasons discussed below, we affirm in part and reverse and remand in part.
Harris alleged the following against Mack. After two detectives from the St. Louis, Missouri police department stopped…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination UnitSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Ackra Direct Marketing Corp. And Michael Ackerman, Individually v. Fingerhut Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Wong v. Minnesota Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
- Onyiah v. St. Cloud State UniversityDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2009
- Norsyn, Inc. v. DesaiCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
- Armstrong v. AstrueDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2008
- Semler v. KlangDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2009
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.