Legal Opinion

Van Winkle v. . Constantine

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 5, 1853PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] When this cause under the title of Constantine v. VanWinkle was before the court for the correction of errors, two questions were adjudicated, first that the deed of John Van Winkle and Jane, his wife, to Jacob Van Winkle of the 5th of May, 1760, was in form sufficient to convey all the right, title and interest of the grantors; and second, that it was valid and operative, without the acknowledgment of the wife, to bind her and of course those subsequently…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Beers v. HotchkissNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  2. Hutchinson v. Manchester Street RailwaySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1905
  3. Simms v. HerveySupreme Court of Iowa · 1865
  4. Hardenburgh v. . LakinNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  5. Lauderdale Peerage ClaimNew York Supreme Court · 1885

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API