Hutchinson v. Manchester Street Railway
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Case, for personal injuries. February 29, 1904, the defendants filed a petition in the nature of an application for a writ of error. Upon suggestion from the court that the questions sought to be raised upon the petition could be presented by a bill of exceptions, the petitioners filed, by way of amendment to their petition, such .a bill, allowed by Peaslee, J., at the January term, 1904, of the superior court.
1Opinion of the CourtParsons, C. J.
After judgment and execution against the defendants in the superior court, application was made by peti tion to the supervisory power of this court for the correction of alleged errors in the proceedings and for an injunction restraining the collection of the execution. Section 5, chapter 78, Laws-1901, provides for the transfer of questions of law arising in the trial of any case in the superior court to this court for final decision, upon a case or statement of facts reserved by the trial justice ; also, that “ any party aggrieved by the ruling, direction, or-judgment of the superior court,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- People v. ComptonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
- Powers v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1902
- McCauley v. WellerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
- Fisher, Brown & Co. v. FieldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1895
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Ex parte N. K. Fairbank Co.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 1912
- Appeal of the Local Government Center, Inc. & a .Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2014
- Barton v. BartonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984
- Lewellyn v. FollansbeeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1946
- Clawans v. WaughNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.