Legal Opinion
State v. George
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided January 9, 2013No. 2012-KA-0204PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DANIEL L. DYSART, Judge.
11 Defendant-appellant, Willie George, appeals the trial court’s denial of his Motion for New Trial, in which he contends he was unaware of, and thus denied, his right to conflict free counsel. Finding no error in the trial court’s ruling and for the reasons that follow, we affirm.
PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Defendant was charged by a bill of information with one count of unlawful distribution of methylenedioxymethampheta-mine (“MDMA”) in violation of La. R.S. 40:966(A)(2) and one count of unlawful possession of a firearm while in possession of a controlled dangerous…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- State v. KaheySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1983
- State v. TartSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1996
- State v. ReevesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2009
- State v. CiscoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2003
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. FontenelleLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2017
- State v. WalkerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
- State v. WelshLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
- State v. KingLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
- State of Louisiana v. Jamal D. HortonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2025