Cummings v. Farmers Home Administration
District Court, N.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MALONEY, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on Defendants’ November 20, 1992, motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, for entry of summary judgment. Plaintiff has not filed a response. Because matters outside of the pleadings have been presented to this court, the court is of the opinion that Defendants’ motion should be treated as one for summary judgment. After consideration, the court concludes that Defendants’ motion should be granted, and that summary judgment should be entered in favor of Defendants.
Standard for Summary…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Marian Fontenot, Etc. v. The Upjohn CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. CopperDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1988
- Lee v. YeutterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. CleasbyDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1990
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. Ruth G. Thornburg Michael D. Thornburg David Jean Thornburg Kathy Ann NorthingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Hilario R. Alvarado, Madel SocorroCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Warren Brown & Sons FarmsDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1994