Legal Opinion

United States v. Cleasby

District Court, W.D. Wisconsin

Decided July 31, 1990No. 89-C-763-CPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

CRABB, Chief Judge.

This civil action for foreclosure is before the court on the motion for summary judgment of defendants James and Delores Cleasby. Defendants contend that this action should not be maintained against them, but that they should be permitted to take advantage of the debt restructuring provisions of the Agricultural Credit Act of 1987. The government denies that the Cleasbys are eligible for debt restructuring. It argues that those provisions are exclusively for “borrowers” and the Cleas-bys are not borrowers because their personal debt to the Farmers Home…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Chemical Manufacturers Ass'n v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. In the Matter of John Joseph METZ, Debtor. DOWNEY SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION, Appellant, v. John Joseph METZ, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  4. In Re BinfordUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1985
  5. Matter of HagbergUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cummings v. Farmers Home AdministrationDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1992
  2. United States v. Cleasby (In re Cleasby)District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API