Menzies v. Watson
California Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco refusing to correct the date of the entry of a judgment. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Temple, C.
This is an appeal from an order made after judgment. It is a proceeding after judgment to correct an alleged mistake as to the date of the entry of the judgment. The record does not show how the alleged error affects any rights of the moving party, but it is stated in the briefs that the defendant, having taken an appeal from the judgment, was confronted in this court by a motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground that it was taken more than one year after the judgment was entered. The judgment purports to have been entered December 6, 1892. The appeal was taken December 8, 1893.
The…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Wilson v. Los Angeles County Employees Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- In re Estate of PearsonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- In re Estate of ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Lane v. PellissierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Verdier v. VerdierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.