Disco v. Board of Selectmen
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtLampron, J.
Petition for injunction and appeal under RSA 31:74-77 contesting the validity of a declaration by the town moderator that a warrant article amending the zoning ordinance and map of the town of Amherst had been adopted by a majority vote at the regular town meeting on March 4, 1975. By its terms the amendment was intended to change from a “Rural” to a “Commercial” classification lots 57-1 and 57-2. Plaintiffs contend that a valid protest under RSA 31:64 was duly filed thus requiring for adoption a “favorable vote of two thirds of all the members of the legislative body [town meeting] of such…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Los Angeles Lighting Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Marks v. Bettendorf's, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1960
- Towle v. NashuaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1965
- Trumper v. City of QuincyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1970
- Town of Alton v. FisherSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bourgeois v. Town of BedfordSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
- Appeal of RouthierSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999
- Smagula v. Town of HooksettSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
- Estate of Croteau v. CroteauSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1998