Legal Opinion

Disco v. Board of Selectmen

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided October 31, 1975No. 7216PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLampron, J.

Petition for injunction and appeal under RSA 31:74-77 contesting the validity of a declaration by the town moderator that a warrant article amending the zoning ordinance and map of the town of Amherst had been adopted by a majority vote at the regular town meeting on March 4, 1975. By its terms the amendment was intended to change from a “Rural” to a “Commercial” classification lots 57-1 and 57-2. Plaintiffs contend that a valid protest under RSA 31:64 was duly filed thus requiring for adoption a “favorable vote of two thirds of all the members of the legislative body [town meeting] of such…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Los Angeles Lighting Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Marks v. Bettendorf's, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1960
  3. Towle v. NashuaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1965
  4. Trumper v. City of QuincyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1970
  5. Town of Alton v. FisherSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bourgeois v. Town of BedfordSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
  2. Appeal of RouthierSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999
  3. Smagula v. Town of HooksettSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
  4. Estate of Croteau v. CroteauSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API