Legal Opinion

Trumper v. City of Quincy

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided December 7, 1970PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtReardon, J.

The petitioners sought under G. L. c. 240, § 14A, and c. 185, § 1 (j Yf), to have an order of the city of Quincy rezoning a district declared null and void. The appellants, like the petitioners owners of land in the district, are interveners. The judge of the Land Court filed a decision holding the order in question invalid because of the failure of the city council to comply with G. L. c. 40A, § 7. The interveners argue to us on appeal that § 7, although concededly applicable and not complied with in this instance, is unconstitutional.

The^facts were agreed and are incorporated in the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Northwood Properties Co. v. Royal Oak City InspectorMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Bredberg v. City of WheatonIllinois Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Women's Kansas City St. Andrew Soc. v. Kansas City, Mo.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
  4. Koppel v. City of FairwaySupreme Court of Kansas · 1962
  5. Women's Kansas City St. Andrew Soc. v. Kansas CityDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1931

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Corning Glass Works v. Ann & Hope, Inc. of DanversMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
  2. Williams v. Board of County CommissionersMontana Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Prince George's County v. McBrideCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
  4. Ouellette v. Building InspectorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
  5. MP Corp. v. Planning BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API