Trumper v. City of Quincy
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtReardon, J.
The petitioners sought under G. L. c. 240, § 14A, and c. 185, § 1 (j Yf), to have an order of the city of Quincy rezoning a district declared null and void. The appellants, like the petitioners owners of land in the district, are interveners. The judge of the Land Court filed a decision holding the order in question invalid because of the failure of the city council to comply with G. L. c. 40A, § 7. The interveners argue to us on appeal that § 7, although concededly applicable and not complied with in this instance, is unconstitutional.
The^facts were agreed and are incorporated in the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Northwood Properties Co. v. Royal Oak City InspectorMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
- Bredberg v. City of WheatonIllinois Supreme Court · 1962
- Women's Kansas City St. Andrew Soc. v. Kansas City, Mo.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
- Koppel v. City of FairwaySupreme Court of Kansas · 1962
- Women's Kansas City St. Andrew Soc. v. Kansas CityDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1931
3Cited by10 opinions
- Corning Glass Works v. Ann & Hope, Inc. of DanversMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
- Williams v. Board of County CommissionersMontana Supreme Court · 2013
- Prince George's County v. McBrideCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
- Ouellette v. Building InspectorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
- MP Corp. v. Planning BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.