Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Chatman

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 6, 1980No. 808PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

The six judges who heard this appeal being equally divided, the order is affirmed.

CERCONE, President Judge, files an opinion in support of affirmance in which HOFFMAN and SPAETH, JJ., join. VAN der VOORT, J., files an opinion in support of reversal in which PRICE and HESTER, JJ., join. JACOBS, former President Judge, did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case. CERCONE, President Judge,

in support of affirmance:

This is an appeal by the Commonwealth 1 from the order of the court below granting appellee’s motion to suppress evidence that had been seized pursuant to a…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. Commonwealth v. BosurgiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MinoskeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Commonwealth v. ManuelSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  3. Commonwealth v. ProsdocimoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Commonwealth v. WhiteSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Commonwealth v. RosarioSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API